|
2#
樓主 |
發表於 2008-11-26 21:59:05
|
只看該作者
IV. CONCLUSION
: R$ f! i# n8 z) U) y5 ^$ fThe designs with 3-stage-inverter and 1-stage-inverter
# [1 w" e l" O5 Gcontrolling circuits have been studied to verify the optimal
4 N1 O! d; j- F1 F" ?, Tdesign schemes in NMOS-based power-rail ESD clamp
/ B, @; @0 a0 u( v$ K+ T5 Ncircuits. In addition, two ESD clamp NMOS transistors, @1 u+ ?$ n/ F; U# j8 Z" L
having snapback and no snapback operations, also were codesigned
/ a8 Y3 _$ h3 e8 B hwith different controlling circuits to realize the
2 g4 m6 x- h$ b2 K1 F( I2 j9 rimpact on their required performance. According to the
2 t6 u0 K1 c7 V" l, W( Dexperiments and analyses, the 3-stage inverters can slightly
( @4 B1 e: a [! Rincrease the ESD robustness, but they also can dramatically
- v; d0 f6 b0 H/ d- Dsacrifice the mis-trigger and latch-on immunity. The 1-stage& i% z: ?. P) |! s" p
inverter should be an appropriate and reliable candidate for the% ~" E. u1 {, T; a3 E( j8 I
power-rail ESD clamp circuits. |
|