|
2#
樓主 |
發表於 2008-11-26 21:59:05
|
只看該作者
IV. CONCLUSION
6 p3 o7 ?* U* ]2 I0 WThe designs with 3-stage-inverter and 1-stage-inverter
" @, a6 g8 O) ?( |& _; w- Scontrolling circuits have been studied to verify the optimal
+ q& J$ p' W" P4 Z6 G# \design schemes in NMOS-based power-rail ESD clamp u0 g4 I, A" f, O
circuits. In addition, two ESD clamp NMOS transistors,0 J0 W2 f0 d. e/ k: J
having snapback and no snapback operations, also were codesigned- p- r2 u* Q' H9 k) a
with different controlling circuits to realize the3 E( s6 S' C' x' k5 e+ T
impact on their required performance. According to the
1 d+ E: G. V$ _* r% h" Gexperiments and analyses, the 3-stage inverters can slightly
; }( F/ }. T) A: J Nincrease the ESD robustness, but they also can dramatically
1 o* I6 {5 C; C1 Ssacrifice the mis-trigger and latch-on immunity. The 1-stage
4 X& ~& j& M& Y X9 G* f3 |inverter should be an appropriate and reliable candidate for the
& q7 L: E @; |' F8 N; a9 u5 k2 C- m* }power-rail ESD clamp circuits. |
|