|
2#
樓主 |
發表於 2008-11-26 21:59:05
|
只看該作者
IV. CONCLUSION8 P% p" u( @% D; G# [) A: j
The designs with 3-stage-inverter and 1-stage-inverter
% o8 Q; \/ v! A- K' t2 y( icontrolling circuits have been studied to verify the optimal6 l! ]7 \; V! Z* B3 {5 j* Q6 H
design schemes in NMOS-based power-rail ESD clamp- k& M2 D# e% U
circuits. In addition, two ESD clamp NMOS transistors,
5 D |7 y$ T2 Chaving snapback and no snapback operations, also were codesigned
- [. O' \! H# \% R/ B5 x% Z1 x6 ~7 y4 _with different controlling circuits to realize the
) A% N) U$ {. X9 zimpact on their required performance. According to the( m/ g$ n2 V) u: O# s0 b1 R& L6 S
experiments and analyses, the 3-stage inverters can slightly
# f% I% j! O v xincrease the ESD robustness, but they also can dramatically* H w G: E2 U6 p6 w8 n g
sacrifice the mis-trigger and latch-on immunity. The 1-stage1 Q$ [2 |1 ~1 b+ E9 x2 l
inverter should be an appropriate and reliable candidate for the
3 Z6 l5 E& V# L9 Bpower-rail ESD clamp circuits. |
|