|
在EDA Board 抓的資訊, 參考一下:
+ o- V8 k8 F3 h* ?1 I! I+ ^1 V) h1 A! D1 R- ^2 y6 _6 K- e
I believe that what you are getting at is that there is a specific structure of P+/Nwell/Psub that is used for 2 c& K* I6 F+ k& o$ o7 \
+ |- M2 T, w" h! q( Ythe "bipolar", so you are asking why use that structure rather than simply a P+/Nwell "diode". Here is my take 6 Q4 {; @( j5 p: p& f
8 P$ a/ Z$ o* H v
on this:
c& G, k5 @1 d6 \, [* d2 F5 R3 m4 X$ _
1- The "bipolar" will simulate more accurately than the "diode", since it will include the substrate current
( s5 b) P4 K( U H3 L7 t
( q: v7 X$ Y% o- ithat is probably not modeled for the "diode".
* d! M! P# U6 B1 y, {9 g* X. U5 r6 Y m/ c& |& v
2- There usually is a specific structure for the "bipolar" that has characterization data available. When + O1 d, \* B' @% P1 k
2 Q$ a" x0 X# }+ G7 w
building a bandgap structure, the good characterization is needed in order to properly determine the tempco of
& D; K9 I6 y5 B6 ]2 @: N v3 |
( b: z+ `" K( O' E `' f4 l& Kthe Base-emitter voltage.
5 |! w2 n3 u) \2 m+ @" k. `0 ^; `1 ^# k# }$ V1 ^) p9 y
3- The additional structure of the bipolar should help prevent current injection into other substrate tied , T1 x( d! G) z( F3 S. g
. a* z" M; k. z# ^devices.! e' a, N f# h3 `# V- B
2 D' n9 i! l3 V- ?$ x# Q) m1 x, @
) T: o& N1 W J7 v
9 l7 [7 N7 F3 n: m
There is, of course, nothing preventing the use of a P+/Nwell diode in your application. |
|