|
在EDA Board 抓的資訊, 參考一下:
& S0 }* y. q. M! t1 M
# J" V; S6 W, X& e. w4 J7 SI believe that what you are getting at is that there is a specific structure of P+/Nwell/Psub that is used for - F- E6 |# \8 |) P' V1 F" A
, \* C2 N3 H, jthe "bipolar", so you are asking why use that structure rather than simply a P+/Nwell "diode". Here is my take 5 j$ d4 N2 ~5 ~/ H% t" r2 K
G% I% X2 C5 F! R) |/ pon this:
* c7 F. u- Q [7 h9 Y I& g. S+ F' Z7 R6 I+ k* O/ h
1- The "bipolar" will simulate more accurately than the "diode", since it will include the substrate current
, L2 A1 d/ R3 _$ w
! R+ n) z ]( N G k8 j2 I! b# p" Zthat is probably not modeled for the "diode".: A' i: x. r" n2 A/ Z/ M4 O
3 |9 A: X9 G4 R2 ?2- There usually is a specific structure for the "bipolar" that has characterization data available. When ' j9 u$ c" V, `. w# ^/ f7 A
: P9 d5 h _! d" q3 Pbuilding a bandgap structure, the good characterization is needed in order to properly determine the tempco of
, ]1 ?: k. z \" e
' j& v' u& N% P9 R8 Gthe Base-emitter voltage./ w5 _9 [" q9 c3 x/ x2 d
' u7 I3 J/ F/ k q3- The additional structure of the bipolar should help prevent current injection into other substrate tied # s4 k* v3 G" }0 K4 s0 F. U# M \
0 l% ~& c, x; L# Q% v1 I
devices.. P( `% W* x% |( t
2 @, ^5 J8 X+ g0 W/ X 2 @& c! S6 g$ `7 p
Z( W; L- _% Z. Z. LThere is, of course, nothing preventing the use of a P+/Nwell diode in your application. |
|