|
在EDA Board 抓的資訊, 參考一下:
; @ f+ G3 Q* h) p9 U
* Q o& f/ \2 MI believe that what you are getting at is that there is a specific structure of P+/Nwell/Psub that is used for : @' ~6 S, `( A7 W3 o
7 A$ a4 u' s6 t! K: B" tthe "bipolar", so you are asking why use that structure rather than simply a P+/Nwell "diode". Here is my take
: U) p: X: O/ U- { b+ Z
) H8 m- h8 e, X. i% f1 I Bon this:4 S2 G8 q' P. Q3 Z' _# }1 i
+ G$ c7 ^5 w- [
1- The "bipolar" will simulate more accurately than the "diode", since it will include the substrate current - j( ~8 a5 M# N* Y+ v
- D! @, J% `* e5 |
that is probably not modeled for the "diode".4 Z" H* k3 y0 ?- G+ Y6 I
& j( c; h: }% V1 i5 l! C: p, C
2- There usually is a specific structure for the "bipolar" that has characterization data available. When
& M1 _/ J) F# _. A) D
h) Q8 j1 n, Hbuilding a bandgap structure, the good characterization is needed in order to properly determine the tempco of
- u/ R! K, Q+ | e3 _: a7 h4 l& _# Q% ^
the Base-emitter voltage.% ^7 p, T, c {
# g+ b7 m5 s; j0 {
3- The additional structure of the bipolar should help prevent current injection into other substrate tied ) ]/ G; M, b5 @6 Z5 n) G i
6 a5 U9 Y6 ^9 m. I: v K" \, {. l9 ~devices.0 K" q8 i, |" |/ i
8 J2 w: O: O$ W) u+ n' J6 Q 5 Q! b6 S5 X6 }
- i! |4 Q- Q/ Z2 A' Q! ZThere is, of course, nothing preventing the use of a P+/Nwell diode in your application. |
|