|
在EDA Board 抓的資訊, 參考一下:3 |2 }; ?% x8 k
m6 V+ e; l! S
I believe that what you are getting at is that there is a specific structure of P+/Nwell/Psub that is used for
5 ^$ h- U* m" A( e
7 w6 b; [' p: G3 @* U8 Uthe "bipolar", so you are asking why use that structure rather than simply a P+/Nwell "diode". Here is my take 6 g6 H* J+ h% y; x& W. J
; f; I) g" K) i) }on this:/ M1 u& [$ N3 ^4 f2 G& c
9 K, e9 m) o- L1 z1- The "bipolar" will simulate more accurately than the "diode", since it will include the substrate current " z$ l2 S! x$ t1 X7 K1 R. o
" e$ F+ m# q0 M6 u" T! e& Fthat is probably not modeled for the "diode".
' g6 e& x2 ~) g# h: T: k; f, K {5 j" Y8 A+ m8 C2 `1 D+ E
2- There usually is a specific structure for the "bipolar" that has characterization data available. When
. o( ]% q- P2 ^4 H' ^' @5 t
6 h0 e# P4 E, z8 g; o( k w( pbuilding a bandgap structure, the good characterization is needed in order to properly determine the tempco of 1 I. j3 w# q, q. T
$ P4 q/ o; W; r' y0 U+ N* O
the Base-emitter voltage.1 J9 W& j; M" {1 l0 J7 y8 } ]# A
! _( ?* J( @; V1 e& H6 y3- The additional structure of the bipolar should help prevent current injection into other substrate tied ! _) ]0 S/ Y6 Z( h& X
7 \' a) v& J c- G0 ]* ddevices.6 r( W3 v1 q. q+ c) Z) n- S' U
& v3 }& `# t1 \% b3 n- c/ E# _
/ y0 D: I& L" I# I8 A5 a6 _7 {' X" i) j- {" d
There is, of course, nothing preventing the use of a P+/Nwell diode in your application. |
|