|
IV. CONCLUSION
9 j- ]! H& s+ E, E6 x* I3 ]The designs with 3-stage-inverter and 1-stage-inverter, [1 l2 i9 `8 u* P( Z9 t) z" u
controlling circuits have been studied to verify the optimal, h* Z' F/ [5 s* ~: N
design schemes in NMOS-based power-rail ESD clamp( \) A7 h+ O3 L+ {
circuits. In addition, two ESD clamp NMOS transistors,
0 r8 L( ] P% `9 b1 y- f# Jhaving snapback and no snapback operations, also were codesigned+ P- x4 H$ |$ r1 |) z
with different controlling circuits to realize the$ u- B8 k$ E7 e& f/ L" \
impact on their required performance. According to the% p! q0 v5 ~8 X" \$ e5 R4 T/ z
experiments and analyses, the 3-stage inverters can slightly0 |+ U( b" q4 e K I6 r+ Q
increase the ESD robustness, but they also can dramatically
5 H- g X9 T3 U5 m) G1 ]' \sacrifice the mis-trigger and latch-on immunity. The 1-stage( M( T$ |9 B9 U
inverter should be an appropriate and reliable candidate for the# Q; w; O, D: B
power-rail ESD clamp circuits. |
|