|
Reply for mt7344
I would like to reply to our friend mt7344.
) q& F7 C+ [! ]7 M8 }3 y" i8 v
! B" X' f1 R! d0 aThey are multiple factors that you need to consider- e7 O, N+ Q5 V) M: t
(1) your requirement of Bandgap accuracy. Is it a 1% or a 10% bandgap? This actually depends on how you are going to use the Bandgap reference.2 V1 f# o4 c6 s. c( Z6 F! s+ c
(2) Process variations would be another factor, this is what out of our control. You can "Monte-Carlo" your circuit across the Vcc and process corners to determine your trimming ranges
' N- x f7 X- H(3) What you should control are the circuit components matching. Say the circuit posted by Mr Leonken01, matching of Q0, Q1; M0, M1, M2 and all the R are extremely important.
! b. L( r2 o. \, T1 I(4) Circuit structure also important, as the circuit mention above, it would be tough to match the current legs of M0, M1 and M2. Unless you need the low voltage Bandgap, I would not recommend this circuit+ }- l. I/ T6 d
(5) On top of all these, your trimming range should also cover the TC, second order effect
# c) X; Z3 P4 p9 mwill show up across temperature
- Y) c( b% E7 v" a- n
7 m9 L0 M, z9 t, ]3 {$ F0 Kthen you decide your trimming range and PAD needed.2 b- d! `+ l' V1 D0 M" ?
% D W+ e$ L1 S$ S: C2 m4 V& {Hopefully these help. |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|