|
1. Open source solution,以Openswan/freeswan與OpenVPN為主。其產品所需的軟體功能有哪一些?7 F; R# ~# ^) [+ i: t/ Y/ {
Freeswan: stop develop (stable IPSec)
7 I7 W$ K* x- J% Y) G, gOpenswan: still develop (stable IPSec)
3 ]! W `% j$ C/ mOpenVPN: open source SSL (user layser SSL)
: W; O% Z6 A, |4 S ^( Z8 K2. Chip vendor solution 例如:Cavium有SDK solution,不用付費但其功能有哪些?
0 \# p' H% W6 u1 r( K而SafeNet的SDK solution則需要付費,有哪些人有用過的經驗?其軟體的整合規格為何?' _, H$ @! o$ t3 P3 P
Using SOC is better. Such as Intel IXP4xx, Broadcom, Realtek SoC.* O' n6 s3 `2 p- @1 O* i. \
Safenet and Cavium SDK is too expensive for SOHO product
( i' P. K: U _* w$ I& S3 ] `3. propritary的software VPN stack。每家ODM的功能有所不同,其所需要的軟體支援與相關整合介面如何?
, i+ r5 |* S* e; uIt is hard to integrate different software vendor's VPN stack due to lack of standard API |
評分
-
查看全部評分
|